Upon reading the latest article regarding Anna Ardin, (Assange accuser), on spiegel.de, I made the decision to write yet another article including all the information I have found on the web regarding her person. It seems she has written an email to Nils Melzer, U.N. rapporteur on torture, on his response to the Swedish allegations. Here is the article in full:
In the above article, once again, Anna Ardin plays a victim:
She has never felt “so much abused” as by him, writes the Swede Anna A. in a dossier that she sent to Melzer’s office and which SPIEGEL could see. Melzer had spoken of manipulation by the Swedish investigators and claimed the invention of a “rape story”.
So he blames the victims, the woman writes; it was “a classic patriarchal technique to define the conditions for how ‘a real rape victim’ should behave”. It also accuses the lawyer of personally slandering her and, in part, spreading the untruth about the investigation, such as Assange’s willingness to testify about the incidents. This is “completely unacceptable, shocking and a reason to quit his job at the UN”.
Anna Ardin plays her part very well considering her obvious links to the CIA. In an article by Shadow Proof seen here, it shows how Ardin is linked to the American spy agency who also spied on Assange while in the Ecuador embassy.
In Cuba she interacted with the feminist anti-Castro group Las damas de blanco (the Ladies in White). This group receives US government funds and the convicted anti-communist terrorist Luis Posada Carriles is a friend and supporter. Wikipedia quotes Hebe de Bonafini, president of the Argentine Madres de Plaza de Mayo as saying that “the so-called Ladies in White defend the terrorism of the United States.”
Who is Luis Posada Carriles? He’s a mass murderer, and former CIA agent. . . .
Luis Clemente Faustino Posada Carriles (born February 15, 1928) (nicknamed Bambi by some Cuban exiles)[1] is a Cuban-born Venezuelan anti-communist extremist. A former Central Intelligence Agency agent,[2] Posada has been convicted in absentia of involvement in various terrorist attacks and plots in the Americas, including: involvement in the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed seventy-three people;[3][4] admitted involvement in a string of bombings in 1997 targeting fashionable Cuban hotels and nightspots;[5][6][7] involvement in the Bay of Pigs invasion; [and] involvement in the Iran-Contra affair…
Wait, this seemingly innocent woman from Sweden is linked to a terrorist?
Who is Julian Assange’s chief accuser in Sweden? She’s a gender equity officer at Uppsula University – who chose to associate with a US funded group openly supported by a convicted terrorist and mass murderer.
Anna Ardin is no victim but a plant to put Assange behind bars to see him extradited to the United States where he most likely will face the death penalty.
If that isn’t enough to make you raise your eyebrows, there is more. I am simply going to copy and paste my article from earlier in 2019.
How A Swedish Woman Took Revenge on Assange
Anna Ardin, one of the infamous women who accused Assange of sexual molestation,(who had in the past accused someone else of molestation as well) was seeking revenge for him dumping her. She then coerced Sofia Wilen to go to the cops with her over STD tests when in fact it was vengeance she sought and she definitely got it. How do I know?
Let me explain….Ardin at the time she accused Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, of sexual molestation, was well known as a faux feminist who believed men kept their dominance through sex. When she wrote this blog post, she also stated that she was thinking about getting revenge on someone. The article she wrote, titled “7 steps to Legal Revenge” I have shared below:
7 Steps to Legal Revenge by Anna Ardin
Step 1
Consider very carefully if you really must take revenge.
It is almost always better to forgive than to avenge . . .
Step 2
Think about why you want revenge. You need to be clear about who to take revenge on, as well as why. Revenge is never directed against only one person, but also the actions of the person.
Step 3
The principle of proportionality.
Remember that revenge will not only match the deed in size but also in nature.
A good revenge is linked to what has been done against you.
For example if you want revenge on someone who cheated or who dumped you, you should use a punishment with dating/sex/fidelity involved.
Step 4
Do a brainstorm of appropriate measures for the category of revenge you’re after. To continue the example above, you can sabotage your victim’s current relationship, such as getting his new partner to be unfaithful or ensure that he gets a madman after him.
Use your imagination!
Step 5
Figure out how you can systematically take revenge.
Send your victim a series of letters and photographs that make your victim’s new partner believe that you are still together which is better than to tell just one big lie on one single occasion
Step 6
Rank your systematic revenge schemes from low to high in terms of likely success, required input from you, and degree of satisfaction when you succeed.
The ideal, of course, is a revenge as strong as possible but this requires a lot of hard work and effort for it to turn out exactly as you want it to.
Step 7
Get to work.
And remember what your goals are while you are operating, ensure that your victim will suffer the same way as he made you suffer.
This particle blog post can be found in a book by Andrew Fowler as well, (seen here)It is obvious that Ardin felt cheated on when Assange went to have sex with Wilen. She felt he was hers. By coercing Wilen to go to the police she felt vindicated. She has gotten her legal revenge for him not making her number one. If you look at Step five, note she says get even with both the ex and the new girlfriend.Sofia Wilen bawled and felt railroaded when she found out they wanted to go after Assange for rape. She refused to sign the document accusing him of sucb but Sweden proceeded anyway.
This is how vicious she is in her mind. she was willing to lie and falsely accuse Assange (who by her own hypothesis, includes not just those who cheated on you but also includes those “who dumped you”). By Anna Ardin’s sense of “morality” it’s ok to ruin a guy’s life because you don’t like the fact he “broke up” with you, (even though he is guilty of nothing but moving on.)Also according to the article above citing Anna Ardin’s blog is this statement:
Essentially, what has emerged in the thread comments, especially on Sunday, is that the probable first complainant, Anna Ardin, posted a blog entry in January about the stages of revenge, and may have worked for a time, in an intern-like job, for the Swedish government in Washington DC and possibly elsewhere. Although the second of these is still up in the air she is an utterly fascinating and extremely complex person, to say the least.
Regardless of if she has any U.S. government connections, she certainly destroyed Assange’s life with her revenge plot. If Julian dies in jail, she has his blood on her hands. I hope she is satisfied.
The next point is if he’d sexually harassed her or raped her, why did she sleep in the same bed with him for 5 days after, continue to have sex with him, and throw him a party? Ardin makes real rape victims ashamed and belittles what has happened to us. As a former victim of rape, the use of sex to frame anyone is disgusting and a horrible way to hurt someone. It seems it is common for the United States government to use the term to destroy people. There are not enough words to describe how truly vile and evil it is to use the term so loosely.
Also, rape victims don’t need fake evidence or send our friends messages like, “I’m done with him, you can have him. Worse fu** ever ” Nice timing as Nils Melzer is going to talk to the Swiss gov’t about a humanitarian passport. Also Melzer did not belittle her in any way. He has been respectful and simply stated the facts.
Don’t forget Ardin claimed that Assange refused to wear a condom and then ripped it during sex, producing fake evidence. The condom she brought was certainly ripped but there was no DNA from either Assange or herself.
You can read Assange’s statement in regard to the allegations here.
Anna Ardin can continue to ramble about her being a victim all she wants, the facts state otherwise. If there were any victims in this case, it would be Assange. If Ardin would like to make a truthful statement, she can apologize to victims of actual rape and Assange himself for destroying a good part of his adult life and maybe even getting him martyred.
Angel Fox Media 