Julian Assange appeared in court today but it was not the Julian we are used to. Struggling to speak his own name and birth date, he explained to the judge the following:
“I don’t understand how this is equitable. [BECAUSE IT ISN’T] This superpower had 10 years to prepare for this case & I can’t access my writings. It’s very difficult where I am to do anything but these people have unlimited resources.”
Appearing in a suit, blue sweater, and white shirt, Assange was noticeably thinner but seemed in better condition than his last appearance in court. RT was the only media to obtain video of him, (You can see it here).
In a press release from Wikileaks, (seen here):
Official Press Release:
At today’s case management hearing against WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange, who faces US extradition and 175 years’ imprisonment for publishing classified information revealing war crimes, district magistrate Vanessa Baraitser allowed the defence two extra months to submit new evidence that is emerging in Spanish investigative proceedings.
The magistrate refused to allow a preliminary hearing to hear arguments that the extradition request for Julian Assange was barred by the 2003 US-U.K. Extradition Treaty, which prohibits political crimes such as Espionage. Assange is charged under the 1917 Espionage Act. (Attached is an information note on today’s submissions from Mr. Assange’s solicitors, Birnberg Peirce and Partners LLP.)
The second application from the defence was to ask the court postpone the full extradition hearing due for 24th February 2020. The application to postpone was based on two grounds:
Firstly, Mr. Assange’s conditions in Belmarsh prison, where he is kept in isolation without access to legal papers, a computer or meaningful participation in his case. These conditions obstruct his legal defence in a significant way.
Secondly, subsequent to the timetable being agreed in June, a Spanish Court has initiated a case with direct impact on Assange’s extradition case in the United Kingdom. The case concerns clandestine operations against Assange, his lawyers and doctors and Assange’s family, including at the Ecuadorean Embassy. The sheer magnitude of the evidence in the Spanish case necessitates that the defence be given more time, argued the defence. The application was refused but will be revisited at the 19 December case management hearing.
https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/10/09/inenglish/1570606428_107946.html
https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/10/04/inenglish/1570197052_180631.amp.html
https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/09/25/inenglish/1569384196_652151.html
Mr. Assange was asked by the magistrate if he had understood events in court and responded:
“I don’t understand how this is equitable. This superpower had 10 years to prepare for this case and I can’t access my writings. It’s very difficult where I am to do anything but these people have unlimited resources…They are saying journalists and whistleblowers are enemies of the people. They have unfair advantages dealing with documents. They [know] the interior of my life with my psychologist. They steal my children’s DNA. This is not equitable what is happening here.”
Kristinn Hrafnsson, WikiLeaks Editor-In-Chief said
“The Case should be thrown out immediately. Not only is it illegal on the face of the treaty, the US has conducted illegal operations against Assange and his lawyers which are the subject of a major investigation in Spain.”
The case management dates were set as follows
18 November 2018
Call-over hearing (administrative hearing necessary to bring a defendant before a judge every 28 days)18 December 2019
Deadline for evidence19 December 2019
Case management case (to review the progress of the case, including evidence submitted)7 February 2020
Deadlines for bundle submission by both sides11 February 2020
Deadline for defence skeleton argument18 February 2020
Deadline for prosecution skeleton argument25 February 2020
Extradition hearing begins.
Prison is no place for a man in Julian’s condition. His health is deteriorating, his psychological state is suffering from solitary confinement. They are martyring him slowly. It is an abomination and a travesty of justice.
The mistreatment and injustice of the slow assassination of this man truly breaks my heart. It angers me, it hurts me but it makes me want to fight. Julian does not deserve to be martyred. His torture and persecution must end. We must free him now!
Angel Fox Media 
The DOJ’s shocking undermining of Julian’s efforts to prepare for his trial is cavalierly ignored by the judge. In all honesty, I half expected her to blame Assange for this unbelievable violation of his rights.
LikeLike